Radu David Turcanu vs Matas Vasiliauskas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Turcanu has a slightly superior second serve point win percentage at 45.98%, compared to Vasiliauskas's 42.06%.
• Return Game Stats: Vasiliauskas captures 47.73% of opponent's second serve points, whereas Turcanu captures 47.89%. When assessing first serve returns, Turcanu is ahead with 29.93% versus Vasiliauskas's 24.7%.
• Handling Pressure: Turcanu stands out by saving 51.5% of breakpoints, above Vasiliauskas who saves 43.06%.
• Overall Performance: Throughout the past year, Turcanu has a win rate of 69.49%, surpassing Vasiliauskas's 55.32%.
• Preferred Surface: Both players excel on Hard courts. Turcanu boasts a 73% win rate, better than Vasiliauskas's 51%.
• Player Experience: Turcanu's broader success rate of 70.69% on the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level surpasses Vasiliauskas's 55.32% at the same level.
• Opponent Strength: Vasiliauskas has faced opponents with an average ranking of 220.13, whereas Turcanu contends with players ranked at an average of 335.98. Which player has faced tougher competition? Vasiliauskas has seen the stiffer challenge.
• Decisive Moments: In closely contested matches reaching deciding sets, Turcanu edges past with a 70% win rate compared to Vasiliauskas's 63%.
• Breakpoint Conversion: Turcanu has a more effective breakpoint conversion rate at 37.97%, outpacing Vasiliauskas's 32.14%.

Editorial Prediction (July 22, 2025, UTC):

In analyzing their recent past, Turcanu displays stronger performance metrics than Vasiliauskas. Notably, Turcanu has a slight advantage in second serve reliability and is more consistent in converting breakpoints. These factors give Turcanu a noticeable edge.

Turcanu's ability to handle pressure, as shown by a higher breakpoint save rate, further builds the case for favoritism. When preferences in surface are assessed, Turcanu still exhibits greater success, performing better on Hard courts, the favored surface for both.

The gap in competitive experience is also crucial, with Turcanu having succeeded against slightly less challenging opponents but showing broadly stronger form overall.

While Vasiliauskas has faced tougher opponents on average, Turcanu’s higher winning stats paint a compelling case. Given these observations, Turcanu is positioned as the likely victor in the impending match.